Choosing what runs the AI layer in the CRM sales process

Microsoft is withdrawing the AI Builder credits that come seeded with Power Platform and Dynamics licences on 1 November 2026, and new customers can no longer buy the capacity add-on. The AI layer planned for the sales process was costed against an entitlement that expires, so it needed re-pricing whatever it ended up being built […]

In this series · Part 11 of 22

On this page

Free Revenue Lifecycle Assessment

Connect with Marissa Wright to receive a free Revenue Lifecycle Assessment Report on your own business.

Book a consult →
  • Microsoft is withdrawing the AI Builder credits that come seeded with Power Platform and Dynamics licences on 1 November 2026, and new customers can no longer buy the capacity add-on. The AI layer planned for the sales process was costed against an entitlement that expires, so it needed re-pricing whatever it ended up being built on.
  • The comparison was made on the work the process actually runs, which is drafting and content checking rather than prediction. At current volume the cost gap between the options is small enough that it should not decide anything, so the decision had to rest somewhere else.
  • It rested on where the instructions live. A prompt held inside the platform never appears in a diff or a pull request, so nothing detects when it drifts. A prompt held as a file in the repository reviews like the rest of the code.
  • Predictive deal scoring stays out of scope. It needs a fitted model and enough closed history to fit one on, which is a data question rather than a model question.